Civil Asset Forfeiture is a lawsuit filed by the State (or the Federal Government) to seize ownership of assets they claim were purchased with the proceeds from a crime, typically drug dealing. Such lawsuits can be filed against cash, cars, homes or essentially anything else the government wants to seize. Civil Asset Forfeiture suits have increased dramatically in recent years and are controversial for several reasons. First, since they are civil cases, the burden of proof is the much lower “preponderance of evidence” standard, as opposed to the “proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard” in criminal cases. This means that the government can forfeit property in cases where no criminal case has been filed, or even when the Defendant has been found not guilty. Second, they can be used strategically by the government to deny defendants assets they need to make bail or hire lawyers. Third, since civil asset forfeiture cases generate so much money (some of which goes directly to law-enforcement), a question is raised as to the motives of the government in filing suit.
- ‘Testilying’ by Police: A Stubborn Problem fb.me/2bTQJ2p1O 16 minutes ago
- fb.me/YPM2sHeU 1 hour ago
- Retweeted Scott Greenfield (@ScottGreenfield): Gideon v. Wainwright is 55 years old today, and we have still... fb.me/8XwcqEelR 12 hours ago
- Retweeted A Crime a Day (@CrimeADay): 16 USC §1540 & 50 CFR §23.15(c)(3)(i) make it a federal crime to travel... fb.me/2xqu9mpzo 12 hours ago
- RT @ScottGreenfield: Gideon v. Wainwright is 55 years old today, and we have still failed to adequately fund public defense. 12 hours ago